|
Related Articles
PLUS loans get an A from many borrowers
Written By: Jeffrey Steele, Chicago Tribune
Experts and parents of college-age children say the federally
subsidized program can ease the burden of high tuition costs.
When Sheila and Jeff Schumacher of Eureka, Ill., sent their daughter
Kati off to Illinois Wesleyan University in Bloomington this fall, they realized they
couldn't simply write a check for the entire year's tuition. They had the funds for one
semester, but not for two.
"We knew we had to find money elsewhere, some type of loan," Sheila said.
What she found after an Internet search was the Parent Loan for
Undergraduate Students (PLUS) loan program, a federally subsidized educational loan
program allowing families with college-aged children to borrow an amount up to the
entire cost of an undergraduate college education, minus the sum covered by grants,
scholarships or other financial aid.
PLUS loans aren't based on financial need. What's more, they don't
require collateral, as long as the parents qualify based on credit history.
"A PLUS loan doesn't have to be secured by a personal asset," Sheila said.
"If something happened down the road, where we wouldn't be able to make a payment, it
wouldn't put our house at risk. With a PLUS loan, if you have hard times, you have more leeway."
As parents of college-aged students have watched their investment
portfolios decline in recent years, PLUS loans have become a more popular option,said
Gen Tanabe, who with his wife, Kelly, wrote "1,001 Ways to Pay for College" (SuperCollege, 2003).
Parents who might never have thought of a student loan now strongly
consider the PLUS loan route as a way of avoiding selling chunks of their portfolios at
a loss, Tanabe said.
Another reason for the interest in PLUS loans is the program's egalitarian
provisions, said Michael O'Brien, chief executive of FinancialAid.com, a San Diego company that
helps families deal with escalating college costs by acting as a student loan broker.
The sticker shock of today's college educations can leave even families
with annual incomes of $100,000 to $150,000 struggling to find ways to finance a sheepskin.
"This product is indeed a form of financial aid that everyone truly
qualifies for," O'Brien said.
David Charlow, director of financial aid and educational financing
at Columbia University in New York, said once they discover the PLUS loan, parents find
it a compelling financing option.
"It has low interest with a cap, a gentle credit check and flexible
repayment options," he noted. "They like the comfort level of knowing that if something
goes crazy with interest rates during repayment, typically a 10-year term, they have the
security of knowing it's capped."
In fact, PLUS loans seem to offer something for everyone, from tax
deductibility for many families to the chance to borrow retroactively.
So why aren't more parents aware of the PLUS loan program? Kalman A.
Chany, author of the 2004 edition of "Paying for College Without Going Broke" (The
Princeton Review), reports the loan's benefits aren't explained by colleges.
"The colleges aren't going to specifically recommend you take out a
PLUS loan," Chany said. "They'll say, `Here are the options to look at.' The colleges are
never going to advise you on a specific course of action to follow. In other words, you
have to become an expert."
Many parents who gain that expertise in college financing options
end up convinced PLUS loans are aptly named. For one thing, qualifying for PLUS loans
requires only a simple credit check, O'Brien said. In brokering PLUS loans,
Financialaid.com ensures borrowers have had no bankruptcies, defaulted student loans
or tax liens, and have made all payments in the past 30 days.
"There's no income scoring or cash-flow analysis," O'Brien said.
"So long as you meet those criteria, the government will guarantee it through the federal PLUS program."
Once they qualify for a PLUS loan, parents can use the loan to
borrow up to 100 percent of their children's college expenses. That means not only
tuition, room and board, but books, travel and other expenses involved in the pursuit
of an undergraduate degree.
There's also the advantage of low rates. Interest rates on PLUS
loans are currently set at 4.22 percent through June 30, 2004, said Chany.
However, some lenders are offering even lower rates on PLUS loans.
According to Chany, the variable interest rate of the PLUS loan is tied to the 91-day
Treasury bill rate, plus 3.10 percent, and has a cap of 9 percent.
Because the rates are expected to rise, Chany is advising some of
his clients to consider borrowing the maximum this year, even if they don't need all
the money. He's urging them to then consider consolidating their loans before July 1
if it appears the PLUS loan interest rates will rise for the next academic year. By
consolidating, the loans will be locked in at an interest rate fixed at the time of
consolidation.
Unlike with Perkins and Stafford student loans, borrowers can
consolidate a PLUS loan even if the student is still in school, Chany said.
Repayment of PLUS loans generally starts 60 days after receiving
the loan, but some lenders let borrowers defer repayment for several years, Chany added.
And unlike a home equity loan, which can jeopardize a borrower's home in the event of
financial hardship, PLUS loans may be deferred if a job loss or an illness interferes
with payment, according to O'Brien.
PLUS loans can even be obtained to cover expenses already incurred
in the current academic year, he said. For instance, parents can borrow the money expended
for the previous semester's tuition. If they used a home equity line or withdrew money
from their IRAs to finance that term, they can simply pay that money back with the
proceeds from the PLUS loan.
All these positives notwithstanding, there are a couple of potential
pitfalls to the PLUS loan program, Tanabe said. He notes to get a PLUS loan, families aren't
required to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA).
While many would consider that a good thing, it spurs some PLUS loan
borrowers to avoid the FAFSA altogether, an act of omission Tanabe doesn't encourage.
By completing the FAFSA, parents are eligible for state and federal
grants, "free money" that, unlike student loans, doesn't have to be paid back, he said.
Completing the FAFSA is also essential to allow families to apply for Stafford student
loans. That's an appealing option because a subsidized Stafford loan pays the interest
on the loan while the student is completing college.
In addition, the FAFSA is like an insurance policy for the future, Tanabe said.
"If one of the parents loses his or her job in the student's sophomore
year, and they've completed the FAFSA prior to the student beginning college, it's much
easier for that college financial aid office to help the student by giving him or her
more money," he said.
"The FAFSA gives the college a snapshot of what a family's finances
were like when the student entered the college. The college can see the impact of a loss
of, say, $40,000 from the job that was lost."
One other disadvantage, Tanabe said, is that PLUS loans are sometimes
viewed as parent loans rather than student loans. With conventional student loans,
students are responsible for making payments and paying interest, he noted. With PLUS
loans, it's the parents' responsibility.
Many parents justifiably believe students should take responsibility
for loans, and that doing so will increase their appreciation of a college education,
Tanabe said. "This is not so much a financial question as a family issue," he observed.
For many families, however, PLUS loans have proven a tool too
valuable to overlook, one that may make the difference in clearing the financial
obstacles involved in college funding.
Sheila Schumacher, lamenting the fact she and her husband never
recouped the money they withdrew from a retirement account to finance their son Josh's
college education, sees more PLUS loans in her future.
"I'm probably looking at getting another one of these next year.
The payments are like $50 a month. It's very low," she said. "I don't see any negatives in it."
Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune
|